Paul Kane

@pkcapitol ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked April 2, 2021

Created

Tue Nov 12 00:51:58 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Paul Kane @pkcapitol

@brianros1 @HotlineJosh @LPDonovan This field was considered strong at outset. Since then a crop of potential stars - Harris, Beto, Booker, Klobuchar, Gillibrand, Castro - have fallen flat. Time to still recover, but so far flat. Their performances gave room for Bloomberg/Patrick others to consider late entry. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 12, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Paul Kane @pkcapitol

@brianros1 @HotlineJosh @LPDonovan “92 was considered weak from the outset. People like Kerrey and Tsongas overperformed. ‘04 is probably most parallel comparison to this field. And not in a good way for this field. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 12, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Paul Kane @pkcapitol

@HowardMortman @dmartosko Wait - Warner voted yes on the perjury article? The one that got 45 votes and he voted no on the one that got 50? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 12, 2019 Hibernated