Mark Meadows

@MarkMeadows ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Jan. 15, 2020

Created

Tue Dec 10 02:12:22 +0000 2019

Likes

712

Retweets

271

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

That’s just one example of plenty. Sondland is *central* to their case, for instance—cited 600+ times in their report. He’s admitted he has no evidence beyond assumptions. That’s their star witness. Huge problem. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 10, 2019

Preceded By

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

An example: if there was a political bribery scheme going on, like Democrats say, how did it not come up ONCE in FIVE meetings between US-Ukraine over the relevant time period? That makes zero sense. You’re telling me Ukraine was extorted, and they never asked? Or mentioned it? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 10, 2019

Followed By

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

We’ve seen it time and time again, as we saw with Sondland. When you start to ask questions, the glaring cracks in the Democrats’ story start to show. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 10, 2019