Mark Meadows

@MarkMeadows ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Dec. 15, 2019

Created

Wed Dec 04 00:13:03 +0000 2019

Likes

3,765

Retweets

1,370

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

To recap: A) There was no "demand" B) No Democrat witness had any firsthand evidence of an aid/political investigations link C) Multiple witnesses who spoke to POTUS say: there was no political link D) A political link didn't come up once in FIVE U.S.-Zelensky interactions. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 4, 2019

Preceded By

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Here are those 5 interactions, if you're curious. 7/25: Trump/Zelensky phone call 7/26: Volker & Taylor meet Zelensky 8/27: Bolton meets Zelensky 9/1: VP Pence meets Zelensky 9/5: Sens. Johnson, Murphy meet Zelensky Not *one time* was an aid/investigation link discussed. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 4, 2019

Followed By

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Bottom line: Democrats can write what they want, but they can't provide any serious evidence supporting this latest conspiracy theory. And they know it. This Democrat impeachment effort is (and will continue to be) baseless and nakedly partisan. Americans will see through it. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 4, 2019