Mark Meadows

@MarkMeadows ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Dec. 15, 2019

Created

Wed Dec 04 00:12:52 +0000 2019

Likes

3,777

Retweets

1,322

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

So again, for the entire reason we're here—the accusation that President Trump tied aid and political investigations—Gordon Sondland, one of the Democrats' most featured witnesses (cited 600+ times), admits he has no evidence of it. That is stunning. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 4, 2019

Preceded By

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

3) Democrats rely enormously on Gordon Sondland. His name appears over 600 times (!) in their report. FLASHBACK: When Gordon Sondland was asked if he had any evidence @realDonaldTrump tied aid to investigations, Sondland said no—"other than my own presumption." https://t.co/4Ff4QHkimG — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 4, 2019

Followed By

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

4) But it wasn't just Sondland. No Democrat witness brought any firsthand knowledge of Trump decisions. Taylor, Kent, Yovanovitch, Vindman, Hill, etc. None. Not one could provide any firsthand information of Trump tying aid to political investigations. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 4, 2019