Mark Meadows

@MarkMeadows ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Nov. 13, 2019

Created

Wed Sep 25 14:45:24 +0000 2019

Likes

7,610

Retweets

3,501

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Seeing some political conflation about two sections of the report: The "favor" section of the call is referencing "crowdstrike," or an investigation into election interference. This is NOT the same thing as the Biden section. Conflating the two is misleading and irresponsible — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 25, 2019

Preceded By

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Remember yesterday when we were told President Trump pressured Ukraine to investigate Biden's son? 8 times? And offered quid pro quo in exchange? None of that was true. They did it again. Just like collusion. Just like obstruction. Same old story. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 25, 2019

Followed By

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

So we're clear, the "favor" being referenced here is that Ukraine look into 2016 election meddling (which involved Russia and Ukraine)... something Democrats have demanded the President do for 3 years now! — PolitiTweet.org

The White House summary of the Trump-Zelensky call does not include an explicit quid pro quo, but immediately after… https://t.co/PtZqQnvKTt

Posted Sept. 25, 2019