Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸

@JennaEllisEsq ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Jan. 24, 2023

Created

Fri Jan 20 03:58:46 +0000 2023

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq

It’s not censorship if you AGREE to the terms in EXCHANGE for payment. I’ve been offered a lot of different media opportunities that came with different terms. If I don’t like the terms, I negotiate or don’t enter into a contract. I don’t publicly blast the offering entity. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 20, 2023

Preceded By

Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq

I have known @JeremyDBoreing personally for years. Offering a starting term sheet that is reasonable and favorable to your company is a responsible fiduciary, not acting in bad faith. Being for-profit and having conditions on content (social or otherwise) is not morally wrong. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 20, 2023

Followed By

Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq

I don’t see why this has become such a big deal or how this can possibility be argued in terms of moral virtue. DW offered. Crowder declined. Neither party is right or wrong or better for those choices. What bothers me is that it’s become public. Literally nothing to see here. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 20, 2023