Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
This is the right call and predicted. The Supreme Court is not the arbiter of how a member does his or her job. This is a nonjusticiable issue. Imagine if a future Dem sought removal of members for “failing to investigate” Trump. This would open the door to further weaponizing. — PolitiTweet.org
George @BehizyTweets
BREAKING: The Supreme Court has declined to consider Brunson v Adams, a case seeking the removal of 300+ members of… https://t.co/5aAD8Uzs8T