PolitiTweet Archive
Home Figures About
Donate
Profile Image

Jenna Ellis ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

@JennaEllisEsq ↗

  • Overview
  • Archive
  • Deleted
Deleted No
Hibernated Yes
Last Checked July 27, 2022

Created

Mon Apr 25 18:16:02 +0000 2022

Likes

110

Retweets

33

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available
Profile Image

Jenna Ellis ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ @JennaEllisEsq

๐Ÿ‘€ https://t.co/HVBXHB0zX8 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 25, 2022 Hibernated

Preceded By

Profile Image

Jenna Ellis ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ @JennaEllisEsq

The content of speech is absolutely not the same. No one is arguing that. This precisely why 1A protections do not allow government to retaliate for content of speech it deems unsavory. Disney is allowed to oppose the Parental Rights in Ed bill, free from government retaliation. — PolitiTweet.org

Jerrod Sessler ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Republican for Congress - WA @Sessler

@JennaEllisEsq with all due respect, @Disney 's stance on grooming children is not at all like @ChickfilA not beingโ€ฆ https://t.co/ogvLnI7sHf

Posted April 25, 2022 Hibernated

Followed By

Profile Image

Jenna Ellis ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ @JennaEllisEsq

@dcrighton The law against 1A retaliation says that the plaintiff (in this case Disney) would have to prove that the action was at least in part motivated by retaliation. Itโ€™s not just a matter of timing โ€” timing can be used as a way to show retaliation. FL has admitted thatโ€™s their reason. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 25, 2022 Hibernated

© 2026 Politiwatch. Tweets and other media belong to their indicated owners; all other materials are licensed CC-BY-SA. If you use PolitiTweet professionally, please feel free to let us know. Note that PolitiTweet stopped archiving new tweets on April 3, 2023, when Twitter disabled our API access.