Mark Warner

@MarkWarner ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Dec. 3, 2021

Created

Wed Aug 11 20:02:13 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark Warner @MarkWarner

Our amendment *only* mentioned proof of work explicitly because that seemed to be the greatest alarm – based on mischaracterizations and misinterpretations – of the underlying text. @robportman and I revised our amendment to make clear that both miners and stakers aren't covered. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 11, 2021

Preceded By

Mark Warner @MarkWarner

Some have misinterpreted previous language I had offered to favor proof of work cryptocurrencies – the intent was anything but: to reiterate, all the drafters have repeatedly emphasized they do *not* see validators under any consensus mechanism as subject to compliance. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 11, 2021

Followed By

Mark Warner @MarkWarner

Ultimately the exact wording describing those validating distributed ledger transactions doesn’t even matter because – again – the Administration & the drafters have made clear to all Senators that validators aren’t covered by the rules under any conceivable consensus mechanism. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 11, 2021