Sam Liccardo

@sliccardo ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Nov. 30, 2020

Created

Fri Jul 19 18:20:06 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPad

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Sam Liccardo @sliccardo

@KS_Sanjose Thanks. We’re adding thousands of housing units in excess of 100 units/acre along the same street, & your team sought to convert one of the very few sites that our community-driven General Plan preserved for jobs/retail, to achieve windfall for the developer at taxpayer expense. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 19, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Sam Liccardo @sliccardo

@KS_Sanjose Kelly, that’s a disingenuous response. Please be specific about the project you believed was wrongfully denied, so we can all be transparent about our interests and objectives. You took a shot—now back it up with facts, or admit it was an unfair shot. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 19, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Sam Liccardo @sliccardo

@KS_Sanjose You are proving my point for me w/ Campbell Ave & W. San Carlos: >40,000 units of capacity in the SJ Gen Plan, yet your clients consistently seek conversions of employment lands that violate community-supported GP while maximizing developer profit at expense of taxpayers. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 19, 2019 Hibernated