Ajit Pai

@AjitPai ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked July 23, 2022

Created

Thu Oct 01 13:23:53 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Ajit Pai @AjitPai

The court rejected the argument. Conceding that the provision of the VAT law was not a model of clarity, the court held nonetheless that the common sense interpretation of it, in context, meant that exceeding any one limit—here, >2% sugar content—excluded a food as “bread.” https://t.co/xmq7pdKsnQ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 1, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Ajit Pai @AjitPai

The question was one of statutory interpretation. Below is relevant provision, quoted in Irish Supreme Court’s opinion. The petitioner argued that law’s plain terms excluded as “bread” only food which exceeded limitations for “each” of several ingredients. https://t.co/JtYDqHbvqA https://t.co/faxTNdfnw9 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 1, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Ajit Pai @AjitPai

RT @AjitPaiFCC: Today, we issued one of the largest forfeiture orders ever against two companies and an individual that controlled each. Mo… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 1, 2020 Retweet Hibernated