Laura Ingraham

@IngrahamAngle ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Dec. 15, 2022

Created

Wed Nov 18 19:11:59 +0000 2020

Likes

2,139

Retweets

484

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Laura Ingraham @IngrahamAngle

If you don't know how to read that I'll do it for you -- there was no statistical improvement whatsoever between those who reported wearing face masks exactly as instructed and the control group. — PolitiTweet.org

In other words, the study @IngrahamAngle is citing did not test for the primary reason public health authorities re… https://t.co/dBu7k9iY5Z

Posted Nov. 18, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Laura Ingraham @IngrahamAngle

No vaccine needed for these people — plus, we should (but don’t) have a test to determine who (tens of millions) already have T cell immunity. — PolitiTweet.org

More great news on immunity for people who’ve survived COVID! To the haters- I’m not arguing against vaccines. Sim… https://t.co/BD6bj9kxSP

Posted Nov. 18, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Laura Ingraham @IngrahamAngle

The confidence interval was extraordinarily wide and statistically centered on 1.0, or no effect, with a possible range of from ~44% improvement to a 54% increase in risk. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 18, 2020 Hibernated