EFF

@EFF ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked July 16, 2021

Created

Thu Jun 24 00:00:13 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

EFF @EFF

In our brief, we wrote that “social media is a central means for young people to express themselves, connect with others, and engage in advocacy surrounding issues they care about.” Justice Breyer acknowledged this in the Court's opinion: https://t.co/EgNMO2Cpl2 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 24, 2021

Preceded By

EFF @EFF

The Court also rightfully declined to give lesser protection to students’ speech on social media. This is critical, given that public school students, like most young people, use social media to engage in a wide variety of self-expression, political speech, and activism. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 24, 2021

Followed By

EFF @EFF

We asked the Court to “limit[] the ability of public schools to reach into and regulate the private lives of students.” Justice Breyer noted this fact: "regulations of off-campus speech, when coupled with regulations of on-campus speech, include all the speech a student utters". https://t.co/Gin9d8Ng6p — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 24, 2021