EFF

@EFF ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Jan. 14, 2021

Created

Thu May 28 15:33:38 +0000 2020

Likes

116

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

EFF @EFF

We agree that content moderation is broken and lacks a human rights framing. Our Santa Clara Principles, Who Has Your Back, and https://t.co/F4kck6qkpk projects have focused on this. But we have rejected legal mandates, and this EO shows why that was the right call. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 28, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

EFF @EFF

Although the EO purports to advance freedom of speech, it disregards the well-established First Amendment principle of editorial freedom, by which the government cannot force a publisher to speak in ways it does not want to. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 28, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

EFF @EFF

Speech regulations are a dangerous tool to hand a government and have historically been used to retaliate against views government wants to suppress and to boost views it supports. This EO appears to be exactly that type of retaliation. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 28, 2020 Hibernated