Michael McFaul

@McFaul ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Sept. 15, 2022

Created

Thu Apr 28 19:26:56 +0000 2022

Likes

1,686

Retweets

196

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Michael McFaul @McFaul

The analogy with 1945 s also very imprecise. 1. By 1945, Japan had been at war for many years. 2. Japan was losing. 3. No one in the world supported Japan by 1945. 4. Japan had no means to strike back at US (Ukraine can do things against Russia inside Russia). 2/ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 28, 2022 Hibernated

Preceded By

Michael McFaul @McFaul

Letting the historical analogy of 1945 shape their analysis, so many assume that @ZelenskyyUa and the Ukrainian people would surrender if Putin used a tactical nuclear weapon. Huge assumption. One can easily imagine that Ukrainians might fight even harder and longer. 1/ THREAD — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 28, 2022 Hibernated

Followed By

Michael McFaul @McFaul

5. Who in the world would defend Putin's use of a tactical nuke in Ukraine? Right now, big chunks of the world are on the sidelines in this war. That would change if he used a nuke. 3/ END — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 28, 2022 Hibernated