Michael McFaul

@McFaul ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Nov. 19, 2022

Created

Tue Nov 30 00:40:40 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Michael McFaul @McFaul

@S_Nekr On this, we agree. As long as NATO stays strong, the probability of a Russian attack is very low. And yes, there is no need for tensions or conflict. There were no tensions in fact just a few years ago Read Medvedev's speech at the NATO summit in Lisbon in 2010. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 30, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Michael McFaul @McFaul

@Hermius1 Our assessments of this history are radically different. Ive published mine. Tell me what I got wrong. Ill respond: https://t.co/rxksoWaph4 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 30, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Michael McFaul @McFaul

For those arguing that NATO expansion is the central driver of U.S.-Russia tensions today, please read Medvedev's speech at the NATO summit in Lisbon in 2010. He gave that very cooperative speech AFTER the 2 major rounds of expansion. See also Putin's friendly speeches in 2002. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 30, 2021 Hibernated