Michael McFaul

@McFaul ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Dec. 27, 2021

Created

Tue Aug 17 15:42:33 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Michael McFaul @McFaul

But that same "intel," as reported to us, said that the 300,000 soldiers strong Afghan Army could resist the Taliban for a long time? I'm confused. Im guessing there's a whole lot more to this intel story. 3/ END THREAD. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 17, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Michael McFaul @McFaul

Those supporting a rapid exit from Afghanistan have told us that the "intel" said we would have needed a major build-up to stop the Taliban this year. 2/ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 17, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Michael McFaul @McFaul

The first U.S. implementation plan for Afghan evacuation failed. But that first failure does not determine future failure. A new plan that evacuates safely all Americans, Afghans employed by USG & Afghan NGO leaders, journos, etc will determine how history records this moment. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 17, 2021 Hibernated