Michael McFaul

@McFaul ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Nov. 30, 2021

Created

Mon Mar 22 21:16:34 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Michael McFaul @McFaul

Conversely, "bad relations" also should never be a goal of U.S. foreign policy. Coercive or confrontational policies are only means to more concrete policy objectives ends. Happy talk with no real outcomes is a failed policy. Tough talk with no real outcomes is a failed policy. 2 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 22, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Michael McFaul @McFaul

As analysts celebrate or lament the absence of reset with China now, remember "good relations" was never the goal of the reset with Russia. The New START Treaty, harsher UNSC sanctions on Iran, new supply routes to Afghanistan, etc were the goals; engagement was the means. THREAD — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 22, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Michael McFaul @McFaul

Successful Amerian foreign policy should always pursue concrete security, economic, or normative goals, not "good" or "bad" relations, and then select the best means for achieving these concrete goals, be it engagement, cooperation, coercion, deterrence, or disengagement. 3 END — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 22, 2021 Hibernated