Michael McFaul

@McFaul ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked April 17, 2021

Created

Thu Jan 28 21:14:42 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Michael McFaul @McFaul

I guess the policy prescription to try to divide Xi from CCP is new (and not very Kennanesque). Seems very hard to do for the U.S., but I'm not a China expert as I assume the anonymous author is (Kennan was a Soviet expert). Curious to hear what other Chinese experts think. 2/ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 28, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Michael McFaul @McFaul

"Bold, ambitious and new"? Really? Seems like a restatement of the current DC conventional wisdom to me. Nothing wrong with that ... in fact, that's good. I agree with much of it. But maybe I'm missing something about newness? Others weigh in? THREAD 1/ — PolitiTweet.org

In 1946, American diplomat George Kennan wrote the “Long Telegram” under the pseudonym “X,” laying out the basis fo… https://t.co/IiiIMQEzK9

Posted Jan. 28, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Michael McFaul @McFaul

One new idea by "X 2.0" is analytically naive: "Dividing Russia from China in the future is equally so. Allowing Russia to drift fully into China’s strategic embrace over the last decade will go down as the single greatest geostrategic error of successive U.S. administrations."3/ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 28, 2021 Hibernated