Michael McFaul

@McFaul ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Sept. 15, 2020

Created

Fri Jul 03 04:41:32 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Michael McFaul @McFaul

@v_zilber @MaxBlumenthal @AlanRMacLeod @RealAlexRubi @FAIRmediawatch What is the word you would prefer to use when a foreign government (not a party in the war) pays a hired gunman to kill a citizen of a third country? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 3, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Michael McFaul @McFaul

Yes and yes. The detailed facts in the reporting make them very credible, and easily deniable if not true. If this intel was not in the PDB on February 27th, the WH could easily deny. They have not. — PolitiTweet.org

@McFaul Is the reporting credible? Are the leaks credible?

Posted July 3, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Michael McFaul @McFaul

@v_zilber I read the PDB every day for 3 years. Intel is never 100% verifiable. But flimsy intelligence NEVER NEVER NEVER gets put into the PDB. That is the most important product that the Intel Community put out. (& why are trying so hard to defend Trump? He's told 16,000 falsehoods) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 3, 2020 Hibernated