Jill Wine-Banks

@JillWineBanks ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Sept. 5, 2022

Created

Tue Dec 14 02:17:49 +0000 2021

Likes

2,760

Retweets

459

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks

3/ That alone ends the issue, but there's more. 2nd, SCOTUS' #Watergate decision giving my team President Nixon's tapes also made clear that even where conversations are about policy and privileged, ExecPriv gives way to overriding national interests like those involved here. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 14, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks

2/ There are many reasons why neither Bannon or Meadows has a legitimate ExecPriv claim. 1st, ExecPriv only covers convesations with the president about the job of the president. Planning a coup and overturning the results of an election are not part of the job of any president. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 14, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks

4/ So here, even if there was a legitimate underlying privilege claim (which there isn't), it would fall because of the overwhelming national interest in learning what happened and what legislation is needed to prevent it from ever happening again. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 14, 2021 Hibernated