Garry Kasparov

@Kasparov63 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 11, 2022

Created

Thu Mar 03 17:46:00 +0000 2022

Likes

22,723

Retweets

3,754

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Garry Kasparov @Kasparov63

If this sounds familiar, it's the same argument from 2014, when Putin invaded E Ukraine and annexed Crimea. It was too risky to stop him, I was told, as I pleaded for intervention and warned he would never stop there. Here we are, with bombs raining down. 7/13 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 3, 2022

Preceded By

Garry Kasparov @Kasparov63

Biden & others insist NATO would retaliate should Putin attack Baltic members. Watching Ukraine, I am not sure of that at all, and Putin won't be either. If the calculation is about nuclear risk, it's no different over Estonia than Ukraine. Don't say "Putin would never". 6/13 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 3, 2022

Followed By

Garry Kasparov @Kasparov63

Risk and costs are higher now because the "reasonable" people in the West always choose lower risk today to guarantee higher risk tomorrow. Clearing the UKR skies after a warning period is risky. Letting Putin destroy Ukraine is riskier, & a human and moral disaster. 8/13 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 3, 2022