Matthew VanDyke

@Matt_VanDyke ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Oct. 5, 2022

Created

Wed Nov 24 22:30:28 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Matthew VanDyke @Matt_VanDyke

@GeneMThompson In the interest of accuracy, they weren’t unarmed. One was trying to arm himself by taking Rittenhouse’s rifle and likely kill him with it. Another tried to beat him to death with a skateboard. The third pointed a Glock right at Rittenhouse’s face before Rittenhouse shot him. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 24, 2021

Preceded By

Matthew VanDyke @Matt_VanDyke

@qbengrl Yes, but even in the extremely unlikely case that Waukesha was an act of terrorism, nobody should be weaponizing for political purposes that remote possibility before a motive is known (or weaponizing the tragedy at all, ever). — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 24, 2021

Followed By

Matthew VanDyke @Matt_VanDyke

@Cindiluuwhoo Clearly, you didn’t watch the trial. Nobody alleged such nonsense, not even the prosecutor who crossed so many lines he nearly caused a mistrial. Rittenhouse also said in an interview after the trial that he supports BLM, an admission that will only hurt him with his fans. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 24, 2021