Rob Lee

@RALee85 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Aug. 27, 2022

Created

Tue Jul 12 17:47:58 +0000 2022

Likes

351

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Rob Lee @RALee85

Consequently, Russia was able to use airpower (though it still couldn't interdict) and artillery more effectively. It could use shorter-range MLRS like the TOS-1A with less risk of counter-battery fire because long-range Ukrainian arty was farther away. 7/ https://t.co/hM7EFOldP0 — PolitiTweet.org

Video of Russian TOS-1A thermobaric MLRS strikes on Ukrainian positions in the Lysychansk area.… https://t.co/SB4ODtXjY0

Posted July 12, 2022 Hibernated

Preceded By

Rob Lee @RALee85

The nature of the salient was also disadvantages for Kyiv. In order to provide effective air defense and artillery coverage for the easternmost units, Kyiv would have to move long-range systems into the salient, which could be targeted by arty on the flanks. (map from June 11) 6/ https://t.co/PoLVJRhjg2 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 12, 2022 Hibernated

Followed By

Rob Lee @RALee85

Not surprisingly, Russia had most of its success pushing westward from the easternmost part of the front, but Ukraine's northern and southern flanks largely held. The main strategic threat was that a large group of Ukrainian forces would be encircled, but this didn't occur. 8/ https://t.co/WFu4yVyKYV — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 12, 2022 Hibernated