Tweet by @tribelaw | PolitiTweet

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

This isn’t correct, @JaneMayerNYer. You’ve somehow overlooked “EXCEPTIONS” at p. 2557 lines 5-21, saying “Clause (i) shall not apply to — “information . . . relevant to and displayed as part of a news, story, commentary,…, or other speech on a matter of public concern.” — PolitiTweet.org

Here’s the language in the proposed bill describing information that could be withheld about Supreme Court justices… https://t.co/nWr7grFWP1

Posted Dec. 8, 2022

Preceded By

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

“Insulting the intelligence of the jury backfired, as it inevitably does. Common sense, always a strength of the jury system, confirmed that a company’s tax liability dropped when it cooked the books to shrink its reported payroll.” https://t.co/Sdkv3sw37S — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 8, 2022

Followed By

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

This misreads the provision, @JaneMayerNYer. I wish you’d read it with your usual care. I helped write it, so I know EXACTLY what it would do and it would NOT have the unfortunate effects you forecast. — PolitiTweet.org

Lawmakers have just added a provision to the National Defense Authorization Act protecting Supreme Court spouses fr… https://t.co/7GH33bcziH

Posted Dec. 8, 2022