Laurence Tribe

@tribelaw ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked May 8, 2022

Created

Sat Apr 23 12:16:01 +0000 2022

Likes

798

Retweets

236

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

This argument is admittedly not based on “controlling precedent” or on constitutional text. In fact, it conflicts with the Elections Clause, whose text gives states power in the first instance to prescribe how a district’s representatives are chosen. https://t.co/zqhxn6IDX1 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 23, 2022

Preceded By

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

.@GlobeOpinion says “there’s no rule that requires Supreme Court justices to recuse themselves from cases that present a conflict of interest.” Wrong! 28 U.S. Code § 455 expressly REQUIRES them to do so. What’s lacking is an enforcement mechanism. https://t.co/O1pG62gK2I — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 23, 2022

Followed By

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

It’s inconceivable that such a meeting could’ve taken place without Trump’s knowledge and blessing , thus placing him at the center of a criminal conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election — PolitiTweet.org

BREAKING: January 6 Committee drops a bombshell in court, reveals that a top aide to former Trump Chief of Staff Ma… https://t.co/kUJdeLYVZ9

Posted April 23, 2022