
Laurence Tribe @tribelaw
No. It’s true. Even as a fierce opponent of Congress’s Act immunizing the gun industry and a strong critic of some key AG Garland decisions, I say he HAD to defend this Act: Gustafson v. Springfield Armory, holding the Act violated the 5th and 10th Amendments, was indefensible. — PolitiTweet.org
Guns Down America @GunsDownAmerica
UNBELIEVABLE: Attorney General Merrick Garland just defended his decision to repeatedly back the gun industry's spe… https://t.co/gUBuIXGVow