Laurence Tribe

@tribelaw ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Aug. 12, 2022

Created

Fri Jul 02 15:59:00 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

“Section 2 states that it applies to any ‘denial or abridgment’ of the right to vote. The Court qualified that broad language, effectively inserting the word ‘substantial’ before ‘abridgment,’ with no basis in the text.” Worse, it added the word “unusual.” https://t.co/JKUF6eQuqp — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 2, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

Alito, & the 5 five who joined his opinion in Brnovich v. DNC, were unwilling to heed Sec. 2’s clear textual command. They invented several limits that will make it harder for plaintiffs to win future VRA Sec. 2 cases — and that appear nowhere in its text. https://t.co/JKUF6eQuqp — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 2, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

“The Court also manufactured out of whole cloth a principle that, even if a particular regulation is racially discriminatory, it can be overlooked if a state offers ‘other available means’ for voting” Congress said no such thing. https://t.co/JKUF6eQuqp — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 2, 2021 Hibernated