Laurence Tribe

@tribelaw ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Aug. 28, 2021

Created

Mon Oct 05 10:47:13 +0000 2020

Likes

230

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

Even though excluding “independents” goes too far to satisfy the 1st Amendment, avoiding any one-party judicial supermajority might pass muster. SCOTUS will be tempted to insist that any consideration of party affiliation in this context is verboten https://t.co/0aRgXn2ldr — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 5, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

This will be among the most intriguing decisions in years. It raises extremely difficult free speech & federalism issues & tests justices’ most basic conceptions of what judging requires. Watch this space! https://t.co/0aRgXn2ldr — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 5, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

"Lurking in the background is the possibility that this could become the most tumultuous and divisive term since the Supreme Court decided Bush v. Gore 20 years ago and effectively determined who would be president of the United States.” https://t.co/yqVCxIyGNc — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 5, 2020 Hibernated