Laurence Tribe

@tribelaw ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Feb. 4, 2020

Created

Tue May 07 20:01:23 +0000 2019

Likes

3,805

Retweets

1,544

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

SCOTUS precedent supports such measures against executive stonewalling. Congress mustn’t shrink from using them. @tedlieu @RepJerryNadler @RepAdamSchiff @RepSwalwell @RepRaskin @RepCummings @RepMaxineWaters @ewarren @AriMelber @Lawrence @NicolleDWallace https://t.co/ifm0Y6yc8w — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 7, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

The S.Ct. has upheld Congress’s power to jail or fine anyone who defies its subpoenas. McGrain v. Daugherty, 273 U.S. 135, 174–75 (1927). See Groppi v. Leslie, 404 U.S. 496, 500–01 (1972) (limited procedural rights accorded a defendant in Congress’ contempt proceedings). Do it! — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 7, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

Trump has overplayed his hand in trying to gag McGahn and suppress a large number of clearly unprivileged documents. He has set things up to make McGahn’s live testimony all the more explosive when it finally takes place. The King of PR will be hoist with his own petard. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 7, 2019 Hibernated