Laurence Tribe

@tribelaw ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Jan. 20, 2020

Created

Wed Apr 24 16:44:41 +0000 2019

Likes

3,546

Retweets

1,546

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

In Walter Nixon v US, 506 US 224 (1993), the Supreme Court held that the Court has no role to play in the process or review of impeachment hearings or trials even when a federal judge rather than the president is the subject. When it’s the president the Framers were even clearer. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 24, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

Here @JoshuaMatz8 and I excerpt the part of our book on #impeachment that anticipated this move by @realDonaldTrump and explained why it’s, well, ridiculous: — PolitiTweet.org

This morning, @realDonaldTrump asserted that he'd go to #SCOTUS to stop the #House if it tried to impeach him That… https://t.co/Mdz5j64jSd

Posted April 24, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Laurence Tribe @tribelaw

The Framers’ reasons to keep SCOTUS out of presidential impeachments: Its judges might be beholden to whoever put them there; they might have to rule later on appeals from post-removal criminal convictions; a body so small may be too easy to corrupt; its prestige might be too low — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 24, 2019 Hibernated