Presidency | South Africa 🇿🇦

@PresidencyZA ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked July 25, 2022

Created

Mon Jul 04 18:20:24 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Presidency | South Africa 🇿🇦 @PresidencyZA

Third, the High Court agreed with the President that there was no factual basis pleaded for the allegation that collusion between the President, the Government and the senior police would have led to deaths of workers. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 4, 2022

Preceded By

Presidency | South Africa 🇿🇦 @PresidencyZA

The judgement stated that the plaintiffs’ argument against the President “is not only far-fetched but also irreconcilable within the context of the email communication contents as a whole….” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 4, 2022

Followed By

Presidency | South Africa 🇿🇦 @PresidencyZA

Fourth, on the allegations that the President Ramaphosa owed a duty of care to the plaintiffs due to his role as director of Lonmin, the High Court agreed with the President that the allegation was incorrect as a matter of law. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 4, 2022