Presidency | South Africa 🇿🇦

@PresidencyZA ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked July 25, 2022

Created

Mon Jul 04 18:20:22 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Presidency | South Africa 🇿🇦 @PresidencyZA

Furthermore, the court made no finding that the President was in fact the cause of harmful conduct. The proceedings were not a trial, and no evidence was led. The Court was merely engaged in a legal debate regarding whether the plaintiffs’ allegations complied with the law. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 4, 2022

Preceded By

Presidency | South Africa 🇿🇦 @PresidencyZA

Four aspects of the High Court judgement need to be emphasised. First, the High Court agreed with the President’s arguments and held that the plaintiffs had not established that the President bore any legal duty in relation to the Marikana tragedy. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 4, 2022

Followed By

Presidency | South Africa 🇿🇦 @PresidencyZA

Second, the court rejected the plaintiff’s argument that certain email communications from President Ramaphosa sought to call for the murder of the striking workers. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 4, 2022