Burgess Everett

@burgessev ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 6, 2023

Created

Thu Feb 09 14:18:52 +0000 2023

Likes

Retweets

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Burgess Everett @burgessev

That shifted things to SASC -- where Hawley also already served. If you want two senators from the same state on the top committees, you need a waiver. Rather than have another fight over committee waivers, Hawley stepped down from SASC so Schmitt could have it — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 9, 2023

Preceded By

Burgess Everett @burgessev

My understanding of Hawley's SASC seat ... Schmitt aggressively (overly, in the view of some) pursued waiver for Judiciary, which Hawley already serves on. Schmitt did not win that vote That left Schmitt without his first choice and scrambled/delayed the committee process — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 9, 2023

Followed By

Burgess Everett @burgessev

Hawley and McConnell aren't exactly simpatico on way Senate was run (Hawley voted against McConnell as leader). So the fact they are publicly agreeing in this story is notable. Not what you are hearing from Scott/Lee regarding Commerce https://t.co/ahGwcCGgtB — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 9, 2023