Burgess Everett

@burgessev ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Dec. 8, 2020

Created

Tue Jan 14 00:28:13 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Burgess Everett @burgessev

Peak coy Lamar Alexander: would vote to hear witnesses "if I needed to. Or I might not. Or I might." "My view is we should hear the case, ask our questions and then have a vote on whether we need to hear additional witnesses or call for additional documents” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 14, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Burgess Everett @burgessev

Rand Paul offered warning to colleagues at party lunch last week "Don't think you can just vote for Bolton and not the witnesses Trump wants," Paul said, adding they could infuriate GOP base Our look at Republicans’ witness debate ⁦@BresPolitico⁩ https://t.co/wu2WjJ3NOT — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 14, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Burgess Everett @burgessev

Romney: “I'm not going to be voting for witnesses prior to the opening arguments. But I presume I'll be voting for that after” Collins says R group wants to “allow for a vote on whether or not we should have witnesses subpoenaed and documented provided” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 14, 2020 Hibernated