Curtis Houck

@CurtisHouck ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Feb. 16, 2023

Created

Fri Feb 10 19:59:21 +0000 2023

Likes

Retweets

Source

SnapStream TV Search

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Curtis Houck @CurtisHouck

.@NewsNation's @BlakeBurman: "Is the policy still considering the 1st one was shot...off the east coast & this...was shot...off the west coast, is the policy...you can shoot it down if it is over...water? Kirby: "I wouldn't derive from these 2 incidents some sort of policy" https://t.co/72MK5SUtVg — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 10, 2023

Preceded By

Curtis Houck @CurtisHouck

.@Weijia: Would the U.S. give any credence to the Chinese argument...this...accidentally veered off course & ended up where it did? Kirby: No. @Weijia: So was it targeting...military sites? Kirby: What we know is...the flight path...took it over sensitive military sites. https://t.co/H64azzZQ4I — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 10, 2023

Followed By

Curtis Houck @CurtisHouck

.@USAToday's @JoeyGarrison: " Where specifically in Alaska was the high altitude object shot down?" Kirby says "the general area would be just off the very, very northeastern part of Alaska, right near the Alaska/Canada border...on water that is frozen" near the Arctic Ocean https://t.co/S7jxBM8vF3 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 10, 2023