Peter Hitchens

@ClarkeMicah ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 7, 2023

Created

Fri Mar 03 15:39:37 +0000 2023

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah

2/2 .@ukurbanite Wrong again: 'He must have studied the tussle between the EU and Russia to attract Yanukovych to sign up for rival politico-economic packages, and the giant pressure *from both sides*.'(these words are emphasised in the original. — PolitiTweet.org

@ClarkeMicah I read enough to identify that omission. I also note that you always fail to mention Putin's meddling… https://t.co/SwIqipvDL2

Posted March 3, 2023

Preceded By

Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah

1/2 No, .@ukurbanite, you attacked the article before reading it properly. Had you done so you would know that there was no such omission. Have some courage and some manners, apologise and withdraw. — PolitiTweet.org

@ClarkeMicah I read enough to identify that omission. I also note that you always fail to mention Putin's meddling… https://t.co/SwIqipvDL2

Posted March 3, 2023

Followed By

Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah

3/2 .@ukurbanite. I make absolutely no claim to be impartial. I strongly oppose the US policy of eastward NATO expansion, as wrong & dangerous. But the idea that this makes me a partisan of the Russian state, a supporter of the barbaric invasion or of the tyrant Putin is tripe. — PolitiTweet.org

@ClarkeMicah I read enough to identify that omission. I also note that you always fail to mention Putin's meddling… https://t.co/SwIqipvDL2

Posted March 3, 2023