Peter Hitchens

@ClarkeMicah ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Jan. 19, 2023

Created

Sat Jan 14 14:50:51 +0000 2023

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah

.@FalstaffBloom . Piuffle. Papal lottery wins would not be evidence for theism *at all*. Nor are 'fine tolerances' the same as fine tuning. The point about the tolerances and the complexity is that they make the 'cosmic car crash' argument harder (not impossible) to sustain. — PolitiTweet.org

@ClarkeMicah @AM_Morgan84 There is no more evidence for theism in fine tuning than there is in the Pope winning the… https://t.co/pkebg61z6x

Posted Jan. 14, 2023 Just a Typo

Preceded By

Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah

Yes, @athertondavid, it is the same if the listener is intelligent. But one version is more polite than the other. — PolitiTweet.org

@ClarkeMicah @AlkemaJan1 “I am not convinced your story is true” Is not the same as “I am convinced your story is not true”

Posted Jan. 14, 2023

Followed By

Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah

.@FalstaffBloom . Piffle. Papal lottery wins would not be evidence for theism *at all*. Nor are 'fine tolerances' the same as fine tuning. The point about the tolerances and the complexity is that they make the 'cosmic car crash' argument harder (not impossible) to sustain. — PolitiTweet.org

@ClarkeMicah @AM_Morgan84 There is no more evidence for theism in fine tuning than there is in the Pope winning the… https://t.co/pkebg61z6x

Posted Jan. 14, 2023