Peter Hitchens

@ClarkeMicah ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Jan. 9, 2023

Created

Thu Jan 05 17:02:25 +0000 2023

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah

2/3 .@nicyooyak1 . Then it became *politically* significant.Its publication was delayed for months as several major journals rejected it. They have never said why…but… — PolitiTweet.org

@ClarkeMicah The Denmark study was a decent subject size as well, just compare it with the polls we are bombarded w… https://t.co/bgXURzNyUw

Posted Jan. 5, 2023

Preceded By

Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah

1/2 .@nicyooyak1 The whole history of the Danish mask study is gripping. Led by pro-maskers, eminent and fair, its publicised planned size and methods were uncriticised by anyone before it began … — PolitiTweet.org

@ClarkeMicah The Denmark study was a decent subject size as well, just compare it with the polls we are bombarded w… https://t.co/bgXURzNyUw

Posted Jan. 5, 2023

Followed By

Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah

3/3 .@nicyooyak1 So how was it eventually published? Was its wording changed? Nobody knows. But the mainstream media of this country, with few exceptions, solved the problem by ignoring it. While pro-maskers went on the web to spin it, and denounce sceptics. — PolitiTweet.org

@ClarkeMicah The Denmark study was a decent subject size as well, just compare it with the polls we are bombarded w… https://t.co/bgXURzNyUw

Posted Jan. 5, 2023