Profile Image

Peter Hitchens

@ClarkeMicah ↗

Deleted No
Hibernated No
Last Checked Nov. 19, 2022

Created

Mon Nov 14 13:09:24 +0000 2022

Likes

12

Retweets

0

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available
Profile Image

Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah

.@NapalmGodTony is another who has not grasped that, in unknowable matters, people choose to heed the evidence that suits them, and ignore the evidence that doesn't. The existence of Father Christmas would explain nothing which is not already explained, so why bother? — PolitiTweet.org

NapalmGodTony @NapalmGodTony

@Notanormie15 @ClarkeMicah @margaret23456 Choice relates to 'would' rather than 'could', which relates to ability.… https://t.co/dJ1YHy1Wx6

Posted Nov. 14, 2022

Preceded By

Profile Image

Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah

.@circenm1. Perhaps so. But in general these 'evidences' would not make any impact upon them if they did not desire to be influenced by them. — PolitiTweet.org

Tenniswitch @circenm1

@ClarkeMicah @IndieChris71 Certain people run into evidences which make them believe what they do not want to belie… https://t.co/9GjFfArl3Q

Posted Nov. 14, 2022

Followed By

Profile Image

Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah

@Richard_Weiss62 No, I don't. Thomas Huxley, Darwin's chief apostle, did not regard his ally's theory as decisive on the God/Nogod matter, and famously invented the term 'agnostic' to describe his own undecided position. — PolitiTweet.org

Richard Weiss @Richard_Weiss62

@ClarkeMicah @margaret23456 Not unknowable. You tweet as if natural selection does not exist.

Posted Nov. 14, 2022