Peter Hitchens

@ClarkeMicah ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Oct. 17, 2022

Created

Sat Oct 15 14:59:06 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah

1/2 Speculation @popovaprof. I expect Yanukovych had made plans for flight for *months*. Why should Lukin have signed it? He was a witness. The signatories were Yanukovych, Yatsenyuk, Klitschko and Tyagnybok. — PolitiTweet.org

@ClarkeMicah The deal wasn’t fully in place and didn’t fail due to Maidan. The Ru rep didn’t sign it. Also, Yan pre… https://t.co/1OwZLzAmjo

Posted Oct. 15, 2022

Preceded By

Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah

@popovaprof Or you could say @mcfaul is stll in the estabishment and Matlock, who isn't, can speak more freely. George Friedman of Sratfor also favours the putsch explanation. — PolitiTweet.org

@ClarkeMicah Matlock says it was, @McFaul says it wasn’t; and the latter was the outgoing ambassador, the former— out of touch.

Posted Oct. 15, 2022

Followed By

Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah

2/2 .@popovaprof It failed because Parasyuk, one of the mob leaders, publicly rejected any deal that kept Yanukovych in office, a stance that won the support of the mob, and you know the wording of that rejection. Surely that is 'due to Maidan'? — PolitiTweet.org

@ClarkeMicah The deal wasn’t fully in place and didn’t fail due to Maidan. The Ru rep didn’t sign it. Also, Yan pre… https://t.co/1OwZLzAmjo

Posted Oct. 15, 2022