Richard Spencer

@RichardBSpencer ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Jan. 20, 2021

Created

Mon Jan 11 20:55:25 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

§230 was enacted under the reasonable and correct assumption that websites would naturally act like platforms i.e., they'd have comment sections and blogs, and this would entail a lot of crazy nonsense, which the sites should not be sued over. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 11, 2021

Preceded By

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

This argument is absurd! https://t.co/cnOgGFJ6Mu — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 11, 2021

Followed By

Richard Spencer @RichardBSpencer

The clear intent of §230 is to allow websites *not* to censor user-generated content. The suggestion that §230 was enacted by Democrats so that the government could censor free speech is just beyond absurd. This was written by law professors! — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 11, 2021