Matt Fuller

@MEPFuller ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Sept. 18, 2019

Created

Tue Apr 09 17:49:58 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Matt Fuller @MEPFuller

Progressives may say, ‘Well, What really matters is the breakdown between defense and non-defense,’ but I’m guessing hardly any member recognizes that they’re approving a topline spending number in a rule for a net neutrality bill. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 9, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Matt Fuller @MEPFuller

In H.Res.293, they set a topline spending number and have a number for Overseas Contingency Operations ($69 billion for security, and $8 billion for non-security). https://t.co/CQKMdKUhjf — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 9, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Matt Fuller @MEPFuller

RT @taragolshan: Clarification here: The rule does not break down discretionary and defense funding. HRes 293 just gives the overall — so n… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 9, 2019 Retweet Hibernated