Mark R. Levin

@marklevinshow ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Sept. 12, 2022

Created

Fri Aug 26 16:07:45 +0000 2022

Likes

738

Retweets

170

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Mark R. Levin @marklevinshow

19. That’s why, at least in part, this indicates the use of a pretext to search for information related to other matters, like Jan. 6. It’s no accident that the same US attorney overseeing the Archives investigation is overseeing the Jan. 6 investigation. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 26, 2022

Preceded By

Mark R. Levin @marklevinshow

18. But what occurred here was the issuance of a general warrant, in violation of the Fourth Amendment, enabling the government to grab everything in sight for a period of nine hours, and even search the former First Lady’s clothes closet. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 26, 2022

Followed By

Mark R. Levin @marklevinshow

20. Also, why was a matter of such constitutional consequence heard by a master, not an Art. III federal judge? A master is not confirmed by the Senate. And if there was some kind of urgency, AG Garland was slow to authorize the seeking of a search warrant. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 26, 2022