Kimberley Strassel

@KimStrassel ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 31, 2023

Created

Fri Jun 10 01:47:16 +0000 2022

Likes

2,220

Retweets

432

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Kimberley Strassel @KimStrassel

It's the equivalent of saying a jury doesn't need to hear anything from a defense attorney, so long as they have the sworn testimony of the arresting officer. Most people wouldn't feel very comfortable with that, even if the officer made for a credible witness. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 10, 2022

Preceded By

Kimberley Strassel @KimStrassel

Actually, not obvious. That's the point. In a normal committee, and in our adversarial system, there'd be minority counsel at those depositions who pushed back, who assured what was presented contained context/the full story. I'm just pointing out the problem. — PolitiTweet.org

The obvious answer: They don't need to. They can trust the sworn testimony of top Trump administration officials a… https://t.co/5FovP7DlM5

Posted June 10, 2022

Followed By

Kimberley Strassel @KimStrassel

If they can trust that what they are observing is everything. That's impossible in the absence of check/balance (see my point about jury). — PolitiTweet.org

The question was: Can they trust the findings of the Jan 6 panel? The answer, still obvious: They don't need to tr… https://t.co/Z3UUJpyAeI

Posted June 10, 2022