Natasha Bertrand

@NatashaBertrand ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Dec. 13, 2020

Created

Wed Oct 30 17:09:03 +0000 2019

Likes

4,661

Retweets

1,380

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Natasha Bertrand @NatashaBertrand

Vindman’s exclusion sheds even more light on the unusual steps top NSC officials were taking as early as May to avoid angering or annoying Trump on Ukraine issues. “It’s crazy,” said one person familiar with Vindman’s testimony. “Vindman should have been in that meeting.” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 30, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Natasha Bertrand @NatashaBertrand

We previously reported that Hill testified that Trump thought Patel was in charge of Ukraine policy for the NSC, but Vindman’s exclusion from a key Ukraine meeting because of concerns over a potential conflict with Trump has not been disclosed before. https://t.co/eOBF1raK7J — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 30, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Natasha Bertrand @NatashaBertrand

Vindman had intended to convey in that debriefing that Zelensky's election was a positive development, per source familiar with his thinking. In his opening statement Vindman said Zelensky's promise of reforms "would allow Ukraine to realize its dream of a vibrant democracy." — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 30, 2019 Hibernated