Cernovich

@Cernovich ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked July 6, 2020

Created

Mon May 18 00:40:34 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Cernovich @Cernovich

@segalmr @OrinKerr What legal mechanism exists by which an Article III judge can order a prosecution to continue forward when the Executive has dismissed the charges? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 18, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Cernovich @Cernovich

There is literally no mechanism by which Sullivan could force the obstruction case to move forward under Fokker and well-established separation of powers principles. He knows it, you know it. Sullivan is using amici to solicit smears. If you're OK with that, fine. But be real. — PolitiTweet.org

@OrinKerr The strategy is to portray Judge Sullivan as partison so that Trump will have more political cover to par… https://t.co/g1iy0LCPWy

Posted May 18, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Cernovich @Cernovich

@segalmr @OrinKerr Even in cases where prosecutorial motive is shady, raising due process issues, judges don't have any meaningful power to overrule. Wayte v. United States (Sct 1985). But here Sullivan can overrule a prosecutor and force a case forward? That's just not a credible position. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 18, 2020 Hibernated