Cernovich

@Cernovich ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked July 6, 2020

Created

Wed May 13 23:37:05 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Cernovich @Cernovich

@Shalev_Roisman @OrinKerr @Greg651 I see that you're a law professor. Are you aware of U.S. v. Fokker Serv. (D.C. Cir. 2016) which is binding authority? Judge Sullivan has no discretion here, and it's not even a close call. https://t.co/KnDXR8xags — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 13, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Cernovich @Cernovich

@OrinKerr "It has long been settled that the Judiciary generally lacks authority to second-guess those Executive determinations, much less to impose its own charging preferences." U.S. v. Fokker Servs (D.C. Cir. 2016). Binding authority, no? https://t.co/gCA8mJh3kh — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 13, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Cernovich @Cernovich

Judge Sullivan has *no* discretion re: Flynn case. United States v. Fokker Servs. (D.C. Cir. 2016) - “principal object of the ‘leave of court’ requirement" has been understood to be a narrow one—“to protect a defendant against prosecutorial harassment https://t.co/PtBkvk5kSm — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 13, 2020 Hibernated