nilay patel

@reckless ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked May 20, 2022

Created

Mon May 09 19:20:59 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

nilay patel @reckless

@BrianKirby161 I am just going to keep pointing at the literal text, which advocates increased government speech regulations instead of private moderation decisions. "If the citizens want something banned, then pass a law to do so, otherwise it should be allowed." There's no getting around it. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 9, 2022

Preceded By

nilay patel @reckless

@BrianKirby161 The problem is that again, the actual text does not agree with you, because it explicitly says government speech regulations are the preferred outcome — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 9, 2022

Followed By

nilay patel @reckless

@BrandonLive @marypcbuk The government cannot prohibit spam. If you want to prohibit spam, you have to go beyond the restrictions of the First Amendment. Once you do that, your wikipedia research goes out the window. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 9, 2022