nilay patel

@reckless ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Sept. 15, 2021

Created

Wed May 05 17:51:24 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

nilay patel @reckless

I understand the optics of this tactic but it’s also like… irrelevant? — PolitiTweet.org

This is the second cross-examination where Apple has made a point of trying to establish that a third-party witness is on Epic’s side.

Posted May 5, 2021

Preceded By

nilay patel @reckless

@daveywallie I think that’s why Epic keeps bringing up lock in and switching costs - the only way to keep Apple honest in that scenario is if you can realistically pick another overlord if they screw up — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 5, 2021 Deleted

Followed By

nilay patel @reckless

(By which I mean: of course the witnesses *called by Epic* are sympathetic to Epic’s case, they wouldn’t be on the stand if not.) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 5, 2021